리플 Xsoftware engineer Mayukha Vadari revealed a significant development in XRP Ledger's formal verification in a recent X post, noting that the same technology that recently allowed Claude to formalize Fermat's Last Theorem is being used to verify the XRP Ledger.
Vadari는 XRP Ledger의 가장 중요한 부분이 예상한 대로 정확하게 작동한다는 것을 수학적으로 증명하기 위해 Common Prefix와의 협력을 공개했습니다. 이 게시물은 리플 명예 CTO인 David Schwartz를 포함한 XRP 커뮤니티의 관심을 끌었습니다.
An original architect of theXRP Ledger, Schwartz responded that he had "discovered a fantastic proof of the formal validity of XRPL's 합의 algorithm. " Formal verification uses machine-checked mathematical proofs to show that software satisfies its specification for every possible input. Where a test suite can only check correctness on the inputs it actually runs, a proof covers the entire input space.
I have discovered a fantastic proof of the formal validity of XRPL's 합의 algorithm, but X's post length limitations make posts too small to contain it.
Schwartzcited an unusual limitation to his claim: "X's post length limitations make posts too small to contain it. ".
The context of Schwartz's post remains unknown; it may have been intended as a playful acknowledgment of an advanced formal verification technique used by theXRPL, or it may point to a potentially significant development in the mathematical verification of the XRP Ledger's 합의 algorithm, as he did not provide any additional clues.
Schwartz는 리플 CTO로서의 일상적인 활동에서 물러난 후 작년에 리플 CTO Emeritus 역할로 전환했습니다. 그러나 그는 여전히 XRP에 깊이 관여하고 있으며 자신의 허브를 운영하고 그곳의 데이터를 사용하여 XRPL을 개선합니다. 그의 허브에서 관찰한 내용은 XRP Ledger 3. 2. 1의 출시에 기여했으며, 이는 7월 말에 XRPL에서 관찰된 명백한 홍수를 수정했습니다.
Permission Delegation on theXRP Ledgerhas passed an independent security review by Cantina Security and the XRPL quality assurance test suite. All findings were fixed in v1. 1 and verified by Cantina, and the QA team found no regressions across 5, 088 tests.
이 이정표에 대해 엔지니어링 JA Akinyele의 Ripplehead는 프로토콜 계층에서 위임을 받으려면 핵심 트랜잭션 처리 동작에 영향을 미치기 때문에 매우 높은 보안 기준이 필요합니다고 말했습니다.
원문 제목: Fantastic Proof? Ripple CTO Emeritus Says XRP Ledger Consensus Is Found
RippleXsoftware engineer Mayukha Vadari revealed a significant development in XRP Ledger's formal verification in a recent X post, noting that the same technology that recently allowed Claude to formalize Fermat's Last Theorem is being used to verify the XRP Ledger.
Vadari revealed a collaboration with CommonPrefix to prove mathematically that XRP Ledger's most critical parts do exactly what is expected.
This post caught the attention of the XRP community, includingRipple CTO emeritusDavid Schwartz.
An original architect of theXRP Ledger, Schwartz responded that he had "discovered a fantastic proof of the formal validity of XRPL's consensus algorithm.
" Formal verification uses machine-checked mathematical proofs to show that software satisfies its specification for every possible input.
Where a test suite can only check correctness on the inputs it actually runs, a proof covers the entire input space.
I have discovered a fantastic proof of the formal validity of XRPL's consensus algorithm, but X's post length limitations make posts too small to contain it.
Schwartzcited an unusual limitation to his claim: "X's post length limitations make posts too small to contain it.
".
The context of Schwartz's post remains unknown; it may have been intended as a playful acknowledgment of an advanced formal verification technique used by theXRPL, or it may point to a potentially significant development in the mathematical verification of the XRP Ledger's consensus algorithm, as he did not provide any additional clues.
Schwartz transitioned to the role of Ripple CTO Emeritus last year after stepping back from day-to-day activities as the Ripple CTO.
However, he remains deeply involved with XRP, running his own hub and using data from it to improve the XRPL.
The observations from his hub contributed to the release of XRP Ledger 3.
2.
1, which fixed the manifest flood observed on the XRPL at the close of July.
Permission Delegation on theXRP Ledgerhas passed an independent security review by Cantina Security and the XRPL quality assurance test suite.
All findings were fixed in v1.
1 and verified by Cantina, and the QA team found no regressions across 5,088 tests.
Reacting to this milestone,Ripplehead of engineering JA Akinyele said getting delegation right at the protocol layer required a very high security bar because it touches core transaction processing behavior.
